tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2618594341866973790.post7197057028655428528..comments2023-04-17T11:32:16.328+02:00Comments on swizzybouldering: why a "new" start to the "fisch-project"?!martinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06512695239247023065noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2618594341866973790.post-41068565894257456842011-04-02T12:29:45.933+02:002011-04-02T12:29:45.933+02:00you were also right with your impression about the...you were also right with your impression about the sds-start. i still think its also a legit start to take the holds you reach sitting - may in the end there will be a sds (for the lazy ones) and (for the purists) a laydown... - wee will see!martinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06512695239247023065noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2618594341866973790.post-20061682044890956152011-04-01T12:30:42.865+02:002011-04-01T12:30:42.865+02:00I see what you mean, and of course if a massive st...I see what you mean, and of course if a massive starting hold is so obvious, then by all means go for it. <br />I was under the impression that you already found the previous holds quite logical as a start for the problem, following the idea that whatever you can reach sitting down it's a legit start.<br />but of course your last point is valid, so good luck with the new start and the FA.massimilianohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07353498846152804294noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2618594341866973790.post-3076115080965472852011-04-01T10:03:32.626+02:002011-04-01T10:03:32.626+02:00hey massimiliano,
thanks for your input. the &quo...hey massimiliano,<br /><br />thanks for your input. the "thing" with starting on the lowest logical hold of a boulder makes just sense for me if it "completes" a line. so if there is such a "starthold" it can make sence, if there is no such a starthold i dont see the point in a laydown either (in an area like ticino). at the "fisch" there is such a very martinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06512695239247023065noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2618594341866973790.post-80648883151891864342011-03-30T19:42:24.404+02:002011-03-30T19:42:24.404+02:00honestly this doesn't make much sense to me. i...honestly this doesn't make much sense to me. if you, who are quite likely to grab the FA, find it logical to star with a hand on the good hold, and the other one on the crimp, so be it. once the FA is done, it'll be up to the repeaters to start as you did, so that they can claim a valid ascent of the problem. <br />to start laying down on the lowest possible hold would make sense only if massimilianohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07353498846152804294noreply@blogger.com